References
Biofilm and catheter-related bloodstream infections
Abstract
Careful attention to detail and adherence to procedure guidelines when inserting and managing intravascular catheters has decreased the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). In order to limit these, health professionals must understand the underlying microbiology. Biofilms can explain the clinical findings most often seen with CRBSIs, yet they are poorly understood within medicine. Bacteria growing on solid surfaces such as a catheter are predominantly in biofilm phenotype, with a group of genes active that allow the bacteria to be tolerant to antiseptics and antibiotics by producing a self-secreted protective matrix. It is unclear whether it is planktonic seeding or small fragments of biofilm breaking off into the bloodstream that eventually results in the acute infection. The literature identifies four routes for microbes to adhere to a catheter and start biofilm formation: catheter contact, catheter insertion, catheter management and non-catheter-related sources. Routine clinical culture methods are inadequate to fully identify microbes producing catheter biofilm and/or bloodstream infection, therefore DNA methods may be required to diagnose CRBSIs. Treatment is removal and reinsertion of the catheter in a different site when possible. However, antibiofilm strategies can be employed to try to salvage the catheter. The use of high-dose antiseptics or antibiotics for long durations inside the catheter and hub (antibiotic/antiseptic lock) can suppress biofilm enough to reduce the seeding of the blood below a level where the patient's immune system can prevent bloodstream infection.
Intravascular catheters, from peripheral intravenous lines to central venous lines, intra-arterial lines or even long-term ports, provide incredible benefits in the modern management of a vast majority of hospitalised patients. The multiple different benefits of catheters have led to millions of these catheters in use every day. Yet there are risks. Intravascular catheters can lead to sepsis in 0.36 patients per 1000 catheter days (Ruiz-Giardin et al, 2019). In burn units this number can reach as high as 4% to 12% of patients during their stay (King at al, 2007). In the USA there are more than 250 000 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) each year, with a mortality rate from this of around 12–25% (Maki et al, 2006). CRBSIs are the number one cause of sepsis in the hospital, which leads to increased cost, morbidity and death. Perhaps the use of intravascular catheters should be limited as much as possible; however, since these catheters provide such a great benefit, it is more realistic to prevent or mitigate complications. For the health professional to limit these bloodstream infections, it is necessary to understand the underlying microbiology that produces these complications.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Limited access to clinical or professional articles
-
Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content