References

Arnone D, Chabot C, Heba AC Sugars and gastrointestinal health. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 20:(9)1912-1924.e7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.011

Agagündüz D, Cocozza E, Cemali Ö Understanding the role of the gut microbiome in gastrointestinal cancer: a review. Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1130562

Barre PV, Padmaja G, Rana S Stress and quality of life in cancer patients: medical and psychological intervention. Indian J Psychol Med. 2018; 40:(3)232-238 https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_512_17

Birdee G, Nelson K, Wallston K Slow breathing for reducing stress: the effect of extending exhale. Complement Ther Med. 2023; 73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102937

Blanco-Fraile C, Madrazo-Pérez M, Fradejas-Sastre V, Rayón-Valpuesta E The evolution of the role of nursing in primary health care using Bourdieu's concept of habitus. A grounded theory study. PLoS One. 2022; 17:(5) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265378

Bo Y, Na L, Libo J, Zhenghai S, Yanyan Q Application of mindfulness meditation on cancer related fatigue, anxiety and depression in patients with malignant hematological diseases undergoing chemotherapy. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry. 2023; 50:(3)118-123

Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2019; 51:(11)2375-2390 https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116

2023. https://tinyurl.com/54t7eavz (accessed 4 December 2024)

Cheng X, Wang J, Gong L Composition of the gut microbiota associated with the response to immunotherapy in advanced cancer patients: a Chinese real-world pilot study. J Clin Med. 2022; 11:(18) https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185479

Cleveland Clinic. 2023. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/24630-t-cells (accessed 4 December 2024)

Creedon AC, Hung ES, Berry SE, Whelan K Nuts and their effect on gut microbiota, gut function and symptoms in adults: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Nutrients. 2020; 12:(8) https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082347

Durack J, Lynch SV The gut microbiome: relationships with disease and opportunities for therapy. J Exp Med. 2019; 216:(1)20-40 https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20180448

Fundytus A, Booth CM, Tannock IF How low can you go? PD-L1 expression as a biomarker in trials of cancer immunotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2021; 32:(7)833-836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.208

Is the microbiome another organ? Maybe we should treat it as such. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/yc2st9h4 (accessed 4 December 2024)

Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022; 7:(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4

Kadyan S, Sharma A, Arjmandi BH, Singh P, Nagpal R Prebiotic potential of dietary beans and pulses and their resistant starch for aging-associated gut and Metabolic Health. Nutrients. 2022; 14:(9) https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091726

Kumar BV, Connors TJ, Farber DL Human T cell development, localization, and function throughout life. Immunity. 2018; 48:(2)202-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.007

Latif A, Shehzad A, Niazi S Probiotics: mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1216674

Lao Y, Shen D, Zhang W, He R, Jiang M Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy—how to overcome drug resistance?. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14:(15) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153575

Lee JE, Lee J, Kim JH Characterization of the anticancer activity of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus fermentum using 2D vs 3D culture in colorectal cancer cells. Biomolecules. 2019; 9:(10) https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9100557

Li X, Zhang S, Guo G, Han J, Yu J Gut microbiome in modulating immune checkpoint inhibitors. eBioMedicine. 2022; 82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104163

Lu S, Cheng Y, Zhou J An open label, safety study of Asian patients with advanced non-smallcell lung cancer receiving second-line nivolumab monotherapy (CheckMate 870). Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022; 14 https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221138380

Lu Y Oncology nurse: psychological nursing for cancer patients, what can we do?. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022; 9:(3)133-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2022.01.005

Madison A, Kiecolt-Glaser JK Stress, depression, diet, and the gut microbiota: human-bacteria interactions at the core of psychoneuroimmunology and nutrition. 2019; 28:105-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.011

National Cancer Institute. 2022. https://tinyurl.com/ym9b97w5 (accessed 4 December 2024)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. 2018. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code (accessed 4 December 2024)

Oakley C, Ream E Role of the nurse in patient education and engagement and its importance in advanced breast cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024; 40:(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151556

Quadram Institute. What are short chain fatty acids?. 2023. https://quadram.ac.uk/blogs/what-are-short-chain-fatty-acids (accessed 4 December 2024)

Rodriguez-Arrastia M, Martinez-Ortigosa A, Rueda-Ruzafa L, Folch Ayora A, Ropero-Padilla C Probiotic supplements on oncology patients' treatment-related side effects: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:(8) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084265

Rodríguez-Prat A, Pergolizzi D, Crespo I, Balaguer A, Porta-Sales J, Monforte-Royo C Control in patients with advanced cancer: an interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Palliat Care. 2022; 21:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00984-7

Roe J, Thompson C, Aspinall P Green space and stress: evidence from cortisol measures in deprived urban communities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10:(9)4086-4103 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094086

Salosensaari A, Laitinen V, Havulinna AS Taxonomic signatures of cause-specific mortality risk in human gut microbiome. Nat Commun. 2021; 12:(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22962-y

Shi Z Gut microbiota: an important link between western diet and chronic diseases. Nutrients. 2019; 11:(10) https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102287

Shrifteylik A, Maiolini M, Dufault M A current review on the role of prebiotics in colorectal cancer. Biologics. 2023; 3:(3)209-231 https://doi.org/10.3390/biologics3030012

Slizewska K, Markowiak-Kopec P, Slizewska W The role of probiotics in cancer prevention. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 13:(1) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010020

The Nutrition Source. 2024. https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/microbiome/ (accessed 4 December 2024)

Tuominen L, Leino-Kilpi H, Meretoja R Expectations of patients with colorectal cancer towards nursing care – a thematic analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020; 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101699

Wang X, Qi Y, Zheng H Dietary polyphenol, gut microbiota, and health benefits. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022; 11:(6) https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11061212

Fermented-food diet increases microbiome diversity, decreases inflammatory proteins, study finds. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/3h6kx7wv (accessed 4 December 2024)

Wu YL, Lu S, Cheng Y Nivolumab versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 078 randomized phase III clinical trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2019; 14:(5)867-875 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.006

Xu D, Feng M, Chu Y The prebiotic effects of oats on blood lipids, gut microbiota, and short-chain fatty acids in mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects compared with rice: a randomized, controlled trial. Front Immunol. 2021; 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.787797

Zeriouh M, Raskov H, Kvich L, Gögenur I, Bennedsen ALB Checkpoint inhibitor responses can be regulated by the gut microbiota – a systematic review. Neoplasia. 2023; 43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2023.100923

Benefits of a diverse gut microbiome in systemic anti-cancer therapy patients

13 January 2025
Volume 34 · Issue 1

The importance of gut health and its role in chronic disease management has become more widely acknowledged in recent years, with an increase in the number of studies focusing on the gut microbiome and the role it plays in chronic disease and inflammation (Durack and Lynch, 2019).

With advances in the understanding of the part the gut microbiome plays in cancer, this article aims to explore the nurse's role in patient education in this area.

The gut microbiome

A microbiota is a collection of micro-organisms found in a particular environment such as on the skin or in the gut, whereas microbiome is a term to describe the collection of micro-organisms, the microbial structural elements, metabolites, and their habitat (Hou et al, 2022).

Within each human gut (comprising the small and large intestine) there are trillions of microscopic micro-organisms, made up of bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi. The daily function of the body is supported by different species of microbes, most of which can be found within the gut. The gut microbiome is as unique as the individual; with the microbe population set at birth by DNA and later influenced by environmental factors such as diet (The Nutrition Source, 2024).

Our understanding of the important role the microbiome plays within the body, such as regulating inflammation, supporting the immune system and mediating certain metabolic processes, is increasing. Researchers, such as Hanson and Barber (2021), have described the microbiome as an independent organ due to the essential role it plays.

The gut microbiome and cancer

Cancer formation is multifactorial in nature; however, it is becoming clear that there is a relationship between the gut microbiome and cancer formation and links between the gut microbiome and the efficacy of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) (Agagündüz et al, 2023). Our understanding of the anti-cancer potential of a healthy, diverse microbiome is growing, with emerging evidence of the influence gut health has on certain anti-cancer treatments, particularly within immunotherapy (Li et al, 2022).

Immunotherapy in cancer

It is widely understood that the expression of programmed death ligand (PD-L1) can often be upregulated in cancer cells, which makes them a potentially targetable expression. The combined positive score (CPS) and PD-L1 values are now established markers that can be indicative of the response to certain SACTs, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (Fundytus et al, 2021).

To further understand the use of ICIs in cancer, it is important to have an overview of normal immune checkpoint regulation and the role of T cells (Cleveland Clinic, 2023).

T cells are created in the bone marrow before moving into the thymus for maturation. Mature T cells then migrate around the body and primarily ensure immune homeostasis. T cells can be grouped into naïve T cells, which can react to new pathogens, and memory T cells, which respond to pathogens to which an individual has already been exposed (Kumar et al, 2018).

ICIs bind to proteins on a healthy cell to signal to T cells that the cell is healthy and does not need to be killed. However, in cancer, tumours have been found to exhibit immunosuppressive signalling factors that fool the immune checkpoints into thinking that a cancerous cell is a healthy cell and does not need to be destroyed (Lao et al, 2022). In short, ICIs reduce immune checkpoint regulation, which allows T cells to recognise and actively destroy cancer cells (National Cancer Institute (NCI), 2022).

ICIs and the role of the gut microbiome

A systematic review by Zeriouh et al (2023) looked at 18 qualifying studies, involving a total of 775 patients, across four cancer types: metastatic melanoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal cancer. This identified a direct correlation between certain microbiota species, ICI responders and non-responders. This demonstrated the importance of diversifying the gut microbiota, especially within this patient demographic.

The CheckMate 078 and CheckMate 870 trials reviewed enrolled individuals' gut microbiome diversity (taxonomic signature) at baseline and then measured response to PD-L1, finding that taxonomic signatures (specific levels of individual microbiota in combination) could be used to predict the response to ICIs (Wu et al, 2019; Lu et al, 2022; Cheng et al, 2022). The use of taxonomic signatures to predict outcomes in advanced cancer is further supported by Salosensaari et al (2021) who cite taxonomic signatures as a potential predictive tool for mortality risk.

The cancer patient experience

With research revealing the potential to directly improve ICI efficacy, patient experience and mortality rates, it is vital that health professionals empower patients and offer some practical guidance to diversifying their gut microbiome.

From a patient perspective, the lack of perceived control after being diagnosed with cancer (especially when the cancer has metastasised) is recognised to lead to poorer patient experience; both physiological and psychological (Rodríguez-Prat et al, 2022). This could indicate that providing patients with education and tools to increase their perception of control, such as making dietary changes to diversify their microbiome, could lead to a better patient experience and ultimately, when considering the data discussed by Zeriouh et al (2023), the potential for a better chance of ICI response and disease control and/or remission.

The nurse's role

It is widely recognised that the scope of the nurse's role has developed over recent years, with higher expectations for an individual nurse's knowledge and skill set, as well as their importance within the multidisciplinary team (MDT) (Blanco-Fraile et al, 2022).

Within an oncology setting, SACT administration units are consultant led but predominantly nurse run and the importance of building a positive patient rapport when delivering complex information is paramount in creating a patient safety culture (Oakley and Ream, 2024).

The Nursing and Midwifery Council (2018) cite promotion of patient wellbeing as a core nursing principle, as well as patient empowerment. The importance of empowerment and provision of knowledge by the nursing team is further supported by Tuominen et al (2020) who conducted a thematic analysis of colorectal cancer patients' expectation of their nurses and identified positive patient empowerment as correlating directly to a positive patient experience. Education on the gut microbiome should be considered at pre-assessment and in ongoing interactions with cancer patients.

The gut microbiome and stress

Psychological stress and depression is recognised to be both promoted and regulated within the gut. The symbiotic nature of the gut microbiome is further evidenced with external stress having the ability to influence the microbiome. As such, individuals under stress can experience changes to appetite, nausea and affects on gut motility (Madison and Kiecolt-Glaser, 2019).

Chaphalkar (2023) described the psychological stress of a cancer diagnosis as having a negative effect on the gut microbiome. This can lead to increased fatigue, potential changes in treatment efficacy and changes in mood and quality of life. It is important to consider ways to manage stress in relation to supporting the microbiome.

Reducing stress in cancer patients

When holistically reviewing and managing patients within an oncological setting, the nurse needs to consider the psychosocial effects of the diagnosis itself, as well as signpost patients to access support (Lu, 2022). The following have been found to help patients cope with the psychological burden of a cancer diagnosis and treatment:

  • Breathing exercises: intentional slow breathing exercises have been found to reduce psychological stress (Birdee et al, 2023)
  • Accessing psychological support: oncology patients who engage with psychological support have been found to report improved quality of life and reduced levels of stress (Barre et al, 2018)
  • Spending time in nature: Roe et al (2013) found a direct correlation both in perception of stress and cortisol levels when individuals were able to spend more time in green spaces
  • Meditation: Bo et al (2023) reviewed 60 oncology patients receiving chemotherapy before and after meditation and mindfulness interventions, finding that overall fatigue scores improved and stress perception reduced
  • Exercising: public health guidelines advise cancer survivors to participate in regular exercise to reduce stress and improve quality of life (Campbell et al, 2019).
  • Eating for better gut microbiome diversity

    Eating for the microbiome is all about diversifying what a person eats. Polyphenols (beneficial plant compounds) are mainly found in colourful fruit and vegetables, cereals, beans and coffee, as well as other natural sources. They are instrumental in developing a healthy gut microbiome, found to promote healthy microbiota growth and diversification of the microbiome, as well as reduce inflammation and they have anti-oxidant properties (Wang et al, 2022). There are also certain foods to avoid when considering looking after the microbiome (see Table 1).


    Gut microbiome-friendly foods
    Food type Example Effect on gut microbiome
    Fermented foods
  • Live yoghurt
  • Kefir
  • Kimchi
  • Kombucha
  • Sauerkraut
  • Weaver (2021) noted the value of fermented foods in increasing microbial diversity, and encouraged daily consumption
    Nuts
  • Almonds
  • Pine nuts
  • Walnuts
  • Hazelnuts
  • Many nuts have a range of health benefits, they are high in fibre, rich in omega 3 and there is a proven correlation to improvement of gut health with regular consumption (Creedon et al, 2020)
    Polyphenol-rich foods
  • Berries
  • Coffee
  • Spices
  • Olives
  • Colourful fruit/vegetables
  • Polyphenols are naturally found in certain foods and often give vegetables colour and taste; they have been found to support a healthy microbiome and reduce inflammation (Islam, 2023)
    Oats
  • Whole
  • Rolled
  • Steel cut
  • Oats have been found to directly support the growth of good microbiota, additionally they are high in prebiotic fibres (Xu et al, 2021)
    Legumes
  • Lentils
  • Peas
  • Chickpeas
  • Beans
  • Soybeans
  • Kadyan et al (2022) describe legumes as a good source of prebiotic fibre, which means they positively influence the microbiome and support increased production of short chain fatty acids within the gut. Short chain fatty acids are beneficial as they lower inflammation in the gut and can help reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes (Quadram Institute, 2023)
    Gut microbiome-unfriendly food types
    Food type Example Effect on microbiome
    Ultra-processed foods
  • Ready meals
  • Crisps
  • Sausages
  • Ham
  • Whisky, gin, rum
  • Unfortunately supermarket shelves are full of ultra-processed food products and there is a clear detrimental link between the gut microbiota and ultra-processed foods. Ultra-processed food consumption leads to alteration of the gut microbiome and increased inflammation within the gut, which has the potential to increase the risk of developing chronic conditions (Shi, 2019)
    Sugar
  • Sweets
  • Ice cream
  • White/milk chocolate
  • Sugar has been found to disrupt healthy microbiota and increase inflammation; consumption should be reduced where possible. Research shows high intakes of sugar are as bad for health as high intakes of alcohol. A high sugar intake can lead to reduced immunity and a higher risk of infections (Arnone et al, 2022)

    Probiotics and prebiotics

    Probiotics are foods or supplements that contain live micro-organisms intended to maintain or improve the ‘good’ bacteria in the body. Prebiotics are foods that act as food for human microflora.

    Probiotics are recognised to help modulate the gut microbiome by positively influencing gut microbiota and have benefit within many different inflammatory disease settings, such as irritable bowel disease, Crohn's disease and cancer, although the mode of action of probiotics is not yet fully understood (Latif et al, 2023).

    Lee et al (2019) explored the use of Lactobacillus fermentum and its influence on cell apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells in 2D and 3D culture. Their findings indicated Lactobacillus fermentum to be useful in a colorectal cancer setting, with increased rates of cell apoptosis in this group.

    Current research, mainly conducted in vitro, has identified the beneficial properties of probiotics in modulating the proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells, including, gastric, colonic and myeloid leukaemia cells (Slizewska et al, 2020).

    The difficulties in regulating the quality and content of prebiotics available over the counter, as well as identifying which strains are useful in what setting is discussed by Shrifteylik et al (2023). These limitations are also highlighted by Rodriguez-Arrastia et al (2021) who found that probiotics have a place within toxicity management and reduction for SACT patients. Probiotics have the potential to both influence disease formation and patient quality of life but more research is needed into their application within an oncology setting.

    Conclusion

    Understanding the influence of the gut microbiome on cancer formation, management and prevention helps informs nursing care. Having a simple toolbox of small dietary changes and stress reduction techniques that can be used to educate and empower patients will support provision of holistic nursing care within the ever-evolving field of oncology.

    LEARNING OUTCOMES

  • Understand what the microbiota and microbiome are and the role they play in gut and general health
  • Know what are microbiome-friendly foods and those foods to avoid
  • Understand the role of the microbiome in cancer and those receiving immunotherapy
  • Understand how diversifying the gut microbiome can help cancer patients
  • Understand the nurse's role in educating and empowering cancer patients by offering practical guidance on reducing stress and emphasising the importance of diversifying their gut microbiome