References

Alonso PB, Andersen H, Haslam D Scrubbing the hub, how long is enough?. Biology Blood Marrow Transplantation. 2019; 25:(3)S367-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.595

BD White Paper BD-8241. BD PureHub™ Disinfecting Cap Design Verification and Sterilization Validation. 2018. http://www.bd.com

Brooks N. Intravenous cannula site management. Nurs Standard. 2016; 30:(52)53-63 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2016.e10315

Cameron-Watson C. Port protectors in clinical practice: an audit. Br J Nurs.. 2016; 25:(8)S25-31 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.8.S25

Casey AL, Karpanen TJ, Nightingale P, Elliott TS. The risk of microbial contamination associated with six different needle-free connectors. Br J Nurs.. 2018; 27:(2)S18-26 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.2.S18

Choi SW, Chang L, Hanauer DA Rapid reduction of central line infections in hospitalized paediatric oncology patients through simple quality improvement methods. Paediatr Blood Cancer. 2013; 60:(2)262-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24187

Chopra V, Shojania KG. Recipes for checklists and bundles: one part active ingredient, two parts measurement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013; 22:(2)93-96 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001480

Clinell. Alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine wipes. 2015. http://tinyurl.com/hq3v33a (accessed 5 March 2019)

Curran E. Needleless connectors: the vascular access catheter's microbial gatekeeper. J Infect Prev.. 2016; 17:(5)234-40 https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177416657164

DeVries M, Mancos PS, Valentine MJ. Reducing bloodstream infection risk in central and peripheral intravenous lines: initial data on passive intravenous connector disinfection. J Assoc Vasc Access.. 2014; 19:(2)87-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2014.02.002

Ferroni A, Gaudin F, Guiffant G. et al Pulsative flushing as a strategy to prevent bacterial colonization of vascular access devices. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014; 7:(7)379-83 https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S71217

Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Mimoz O. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2010; 14:(2) https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8853

Fronzo C. Approaches for standardising best practice to reduce CRBSIs and CLABSIs. Br J Nurs.. 2017; 26:(19)S32-5 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.19.S32

Hadaway L. Short peripheral intravenous catheters and infections. J Infus Nurs.. 2012; 35:(4)230-40 https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0b013e31825af099

Hakko E, Guvenc S, Karaman I, Cakmak A, Erdem T, Cakmakci M. Long-term sustainability of zero central-line associated bloodstream infections is possible with high compliance with care bundle elements. East Mediterr Health J.. 2015; 2:(4)293-298

Han Z, Liang S, Marschall J. Current strategies for the prevention and management of central line-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Drug Resist.. 2010; 10:(3)147-63 https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S10105

Needleless connectors and bacteraemia: is there a relationship?. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/y3wbc5mk (accessed 2 March 2019)

Harnage S. Seven years of zero central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Br J Nurs.. 2012; 21:(21)S6-12

Health Protection Agency. English National Point Prevalence Survey on Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use, 2011: Preliminary data. 2012. https://tinyurl.com/yybr3zdx (accessed 23 February 2019)

Holzmann-Pazgal G. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). In: Chase McNeil J, Campbell JR, Crews JD (eds). : Springer; 2019

Hugill K. Preventing bloodstream infection in IV therapy. Br J Nurs.. 2017; 26:(14)S4-S10 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.14.S4

Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion therapy standards of practice. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/y9z8763w (accessed 8 October 2018)

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Bundles. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/y49wz4gm (accessed 10 June 2019)

Kallen AJ, Patel PR, O'Grady NP. Preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections outside the intensive care unit: expanding prevention to new settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 51:(3)335-41 https://doi.org/10.1086/653942

Kamboj M, Blair R, Bell N Use of disinfection cap to reduce central-line-associated bloodstream infection and blood culture contamination among hematology-oncology patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 2015; 36:(12)1401-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2015.219

Kelly LJ, Jones T, Kirkham S. Needle-free devices: keeping the system closed. Br J Nurs.. 2017; 26:(2)S14-19 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.2.S14

Lavery I, Ingram P. Venepuncture: best practice. Nurs Stand. 2005; 19:(49)55-65

Loveday H, Wilson J, Pratt R epic3: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect.. 2014; 86:S1-S70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60012-2

Madni T, Eastman AL. CLABSI. In: Salim A, Brown C, Inaba K, Martin MJ. (eds). : Springer; 2018

McGuire R. Assessing standards of vascular access device care. Br J Nurs.. 2015; 24:(8)S29-S35 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup8.S29

Merrill KC, Sumner S, Linford L, Taylor C, Macintosh C. Impact of universal disinfectant cap implementation on central line-associated bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42:(12)1274-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.09.008

Disinfection of needleless connector hubs: clinical evidence systematic review. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/y5zkx3l6 (accessed 21 May 2019)

Moureau NL, Marsh N, Zhang L Evaluation of skin Colonisation and placement of vascular access device exit sites (ESCAPE study). J Infect Prev.. 2019; 20:(1)51-59 https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177418805836

Nicolás FG, Casariego GJ, Romero MM, García JG, Diaz RR, Perez JA. Reducing the degree of colonisation of venous access catheters by continuous passive disinfection. Eur J Hosp Pharm.. 2016; 23:(3)1-3

Percival SL, Williams DW, Randle J, Cooper T. Biofilms in Infection Prevention and Control.: Elsevier; 2014

Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med.. 355:(26)2725-32

Ramirez C, Lee AM, Welch K. Central venous catheter protective connector caps reduce intraluminal catheter-related infection. J Assoc Vasc Access.. 2012; 17:(4)210-213

Curos®: national IV port cleaning survey results. 2014. http://tinyurl.com/zx4glu4 (accessed 25 March 2019)

Royal College of Nursing. Standards for Infusion Therapy. 2016. https://preview.tinyurl.com/hgrrejf (accessed 21 May 2019)

Sichieri K, Iida LIS, Garcia PC Central line bundle maintenance among adults in a university hospital intensive care unit in São Paulo, Brazil: a best practice implementation project. JBI Database Systematic Rev Implement Rep.. 2018; 16:(6)1454-73 https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003561

Simon A, Furtwängler R, Graf N Surveillance of bloodstream infections in pediatric cancer centers: what have we learned and how do we move on?. GMS: Hyg Infect Control. 2016; 11:(doc 11) https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000271

Stango C, Runyan D, Stern J, Macri I, Vacca M. A successful approach to reducing bloodstream infections based on a disinfection device for intravenous needleless connector hubs. J Infus Nurs.. 2014; 37:(6)462-465 https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000075

Stevens TP, Schulman J. Evidence-based approach to preventing central line-associated bloodstream infection in the NICU. Acta Paediatr.. 2012; 101:(464)11-16

Sweet MA, Cumpston A, Briggs F, Craig M, Hamadani M. Impact of alcohol-impregnated port protectors and needleless neutral pressure connectors on central line-associated bloodstream infections and contamination of blood cultures in an inpatient oncology unit. Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40:(10)931-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.00710.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.025

Taylor RW, Palagiri AV. Central venous catheterization. Crit Care Med.. 2007; 35:(5)1390-1396

Thokala P, Arrowsmith M, Poku E Economic impact of Tegaderm chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) dressing in critically ill patients. J Infect Prev.. 2016; 17:(5)216-223

van Cott H. Human errors: their causes and reduction. In: Bogner MS. (ed). : CRC Press; 1994

Voor In't Holt AF, Helder OK, Vos MC Antiseptic barrier cap effective in reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud.. 2017; 69:34-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.007

Wallis MC, McGrail M, Webster J Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.. 2014; 35:(1)63-8 https://doi.org/10.1086/674398

Woller SC, Stevens SM, Evans RS. The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) initiative: a summary and review of peripherally inserted central catheter and venous catheter appropriate use. J Hosp Med.. 2016; 11:(4)306-10 https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2525

Wright MO, Tropp J, Schora DM Continuous passive disinfection of catheter hubs prevents contamination and bloodstream infection. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41:(1)33-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.030

The case for using a disinfecting cap for needlefree connectors

25 July 2019
Volume 28 · Issue 14

Abstract

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a signification cause of infection. When CRBSI rates are high, the cost to the patient and the organisation can be significant. More than ever before, there is a high demand for vascular access. Advances in treatment often entail extended indwell times for central vascular access devices. The care and maintenance of these devices is crucial in avoiding complications such as infection. Using care bundles in conjunction with other simple interventions, such as passive disinfecting caps, can help reduce CRBSI rates. The published evidence demonstrates that passive disinfecting caps can help reduce infection rates associated with different types of central venous catheters by protecting needlefree connectors from colonisation by pathogens and serving as a clear indicator that the line has been disinfected.

Healthcare-associated infection is a major patient safety concern that causes morbidity, mortality and increased healthcare costs. The prevention, or at least significant reduction, of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) requires a multimodal approach, with adherence to rigorous application of standardised infection prevention and control behaviours (Loveday et al, 2014). Vascular access remains the most frequent invasive procedure undertaken in healthcare, with 60% of patients in the UK and 80% in the US requiring intravenous (IV) access (Lavery and Ingram, 2005; Hadaway, 2012; Wallis et al, 2014). However, the lack of compliance to best practice by many health professionals continues to create a high risk of infection and other complications.

In 2016, Pronovost et al published research on the progress of the first version of the Michigan Keystone project research data, which had been initiated in 2009. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in central venous catheter-related infection following implementation of simple infection-control practices such as standardised skin decontamination before catheter insertion; use of sterile drapes, gowns and gloves; and use of ultrasound to cannulate the vessel. (By reducing multiple needlesticks, ultrasound will not only increase vessel health but also reduce the number of breaches in the skin, and thus the risk of contamination and infection.)

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content