References

Baxter SK, Brumfitt SM Benefits and losses: a qualitative study exploring healthcare staff perceptions of teamworking. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008; 17:(2)127-130 https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.022277

Boltey E, Iwashyna T, Cohn A, Costa D Identifying the unique behaviors embedded in the process of interprofessional collaboration in the ICU. J Interprof Care. 2023; 37:(6)857-865 https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2202218

Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017; 4 https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282

Braun V, Clarke V Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3:(2)77-101 https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun V, Clarke V A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International. Health Promot Int. 2024; 39:(3) https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae049

Carradore M, Barucca L, Bertuccioli M La collaborazione interprofessionale in area critica in Italia: il punto di vista degli infermieri. Scenario®-Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza. 2022; 39:(2)5-10

Crowe M, Inder M, Porter R Conducting qualitative research in mental health: thematic and content analyses. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015; 49:(7)616-623 https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415582053

Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 36:(4)253-263 https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253

Federazione Nazionale Collegi Professionali Tecnici Sanitari di Radiologia Medica. Codice deontologico del tecnico sanitario di radiologia medica. [National Federation of Professional Colleges of Medical Radiology Healthcare Technicians. Code of ethics for medical radiology technicians.]. 2004. https://www.tsrm-pstrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Codice-deontologico-TSRM.pdf (accessed 5 February 2025)

Federazione Nazionale Ordini delle Professioni Infermieristiche. Codice deontologico delle professioni infermieristiche. [National Federation of Nursing Professions. Code of ethics for nursing professions.]. 2019. https://www.fnopi.it/archivio_news/attualita/2688/codice%20deontologico_2019.pdf (accessed 5 February 2025)

Gnecco G, Landi S, Riccaboni M The emergence of social soft skill needs in the post COVID-19 era. Qual Quant. 2023; 58:(1)1-34

Goulart BF, Camelo SHH, Simões ALDA, Chaves LDP Trabajo en equipo en unidad coronaria: facilidades y dificultades [Teamwork in a coronary care unit: facilitating and hindering aspects. Available in Spanish, English and Portuguese.]. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2016; 50:(03)0482-0489 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420160000400015

Heip T, Van Hecke A, Malfait S, Van Biesen W, Eeckloo K The effects of interdisciplinary bedside rounds on patient centeredness, quality of care, and team collaboration: a systematic review. J Patient Saf. 2022; 18:(1)e40-e44 https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000695

Hennink M, Kaiser BN Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022; 292 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Hirshon JM, Risko N, Calvello EJB Health systems and services: the role of acute care. Bull World Health Organ. 2013; 91:(5)386-388 https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.112664

Koch T Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. J Adv Nurs. 2006; 53:(1)91-100 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03681.x

Lamberti G, Tomas AB, Laura T University image, hard skills or soft skills: which matters most for which graduate students?. Quality & Quantity. 2023; 57:553-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01149-z

Mudadi L, Mutandiro L, Bwanga O, Nyawani P, Matika W, Chinene B Attitudes and barriers to interprofessional collaboration among radiographers: A multi-country perspective. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024; 55:(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2023.12.010

Muusse JSC, Zuidema R, van Scherpenseel MC, Velde SJ Influencing factors of interprofessional collaboration in multifactorial fall prevention interventions: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Primary Care. 2023; 24:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02066-w

Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Libr. 2017; 2018:(8) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3

Sandelowski M Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23:(4)334-340 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19:(6)349-357 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Vaseghi F, Yarmohammadian MH, Raeisi A Interprofessional collaboration competencies in the health system: A systematic review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022; 27:(6)496-504 https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_476_21

Vittadello F, Mischo-Kelling M, Wieser H A multiple-group measurement scale for interprofessional collaboration: adaptation and validation into Italian and German languages. J Interprof Care. 2018; 32:(3)266-273 https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1396298

Will KK, Johnson ML, Lamb G Team-based care and patient satisfaction in the hospital setting: a systematic review. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2019; 6:(2)158-171 https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1695

Interprofessional collaboration in acute care settings: qualitative research among nurses and radiographers

20 February 2025
Volume 34 · Issue 4

Abstract

Background:

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) not only benefits the multiprofessional team, but also has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Understanding the roles of health professional colleagues can lay a strong foundation for IPC, particularly in settings where timely procedures are crucial.

Aims.

This study aimed to analyse perceptions of IPC among nurses and radiographers working in acute care settings.

Methods:

A descriptive qualitative study involving online focus groups of nurses and radiographers working in acute care. The data collected were analysed through thematic analysis.

Findings:

Four dimensions emerged from the analysis – organisational dimension, cognitive dimension, individual dimension and relational. Each represented a well-defined area and could be divided further into subthemes.

Conclusion:

The four dimensions influence IPC among nurses and radiographers in acute care. Improving the factors identified and implementing changes can have a positive impact on patients' quality of care.

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) involves different health professionals working co-operatively to positively impact the quality and safety of patient care, by integrating their skills and maximising their contribution to the care of the patient. It is worth highlighting that the pandemic affected the perception of IPC, with an increase in risk perception and awareness of the importance of this way of working compared with pre-pandemic times.

One definition of IPC describes it as a simple approach that is achievable in practice but, to ensure that it works well, an imbalance of authority, disagreement between health professional groups, and poor understanding of mutual roles and responsibilities all have to be taken into account (Carradore et al, 2022). It can also be defined as a collaborative practice, with a variety of health professional groups working with patients, families and caregivers to ensure the delivery of the highest possible quality of care (Muusse et al, 2023).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content