References

Department of Health and Social Care. The Department of Health and Social Care mandate to Health Education England: April 2021 to March 2022. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/5n9ar6pf (accessed 27 January 2023)

Department of Health and Social Care. Education and training tariffs. Tariff guidance and prices for the 2022 to 2023 financial year guidance. 2022. https://tinyurl.com/2h2688wn (accessed 27 January 2023)

Drayton L, Edmonds M. Understanding the role of the academic assessor. Nurs Stand. 2020; 35:(9)41-45 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2020.e11463

Eick SA, Williamson GR, Heath V. A systematic review of placement-related attrition in nurse education. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012; 49:(10)1299-1309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.12.004

Harrison-White K, Owens J. Nurse link lecturers' perceptions of the challenges facing student nurses in clinical learning environments: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018; 32:78-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.012

Health Education England. Reducing Pre-registration Attrition and Improving Retention. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/2p97b3th (accessed 27 January 2023)

Henderson A, Eaton E. Assisting nurses to facilitate student and new graduate learning in practice settings: What ‘support’ do nurses at the bedside need?. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013; 13:(3)197-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.09.005

Hoy G, George S. New standards on the supervision and assessment of students in practice. Nurs Times. 2018; 114:(12)27-29

Hughes LJ, Mitchell ML, Johnston ANB. Just how bad does it have to be? Industry and academic assessors' experiences of failing to fail – A descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019; 76:206-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.011

Keeping-Burke L, McCloskey R, Donovan C, Yetman L, Goudreau A. Nursing students' experiences with clinical placement in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020; 18:(5)986-1018 https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00122

Knight KH, Leigh J, Whaley V, Rabie G, Matthews M, Doyle K. The supervisor conundrum. Br J Nurs. 2021; 30:(20) https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.20.1156

Leigh J, Roberts D. Critical exploration of the new NMC standards of proficiency for registered nurses. Br J Nurs. 2018; 27:(18)1068-1072 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.18.1068

Leigh J, Littlewood L, Lyons G. Reflection on creating a coaching approach to student nurse clinical leadership development. Br J Nurs. 2019; 28:(17)1124-1128 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.17.1124

Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. 2014. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173

Myall M, Levett-Jones T, Lathlean J. Mentorship in contemporary practice: the experiences of nursing students and practice mentors. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17:(14)1834-1842 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02233.x

Newton J, Taylor RM, Crighton L. A mixed-methods study exploring sign-off mentorship practices in relation to the Nursing and Midwifery Council standards. J Clin Nurs. 2017; 26:(19-20)3056-3066 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13652

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards for learning and assessment in practice. Preparation for mentors, practice teachers and teachers. 2008. https://tinyurl.com/bdda6hen (accessed 27 January 2023)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards of proficiency for registered nurses. 2018a. https://tinyurl.com/dkdthxvh (accessed 27 January 2023)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards for student supervision and assessment. 2018b. https://tinyurl.com/2f2pbpzb (accessed 27 January 2023)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Current recovery programme standards. 2022. https://tinyurl.com/ua6f6dp5 (accessed 27 January 2023)

Panda S, Dash M, John J Challenges faced by student nurses and midwives in clinical learning environment – A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurse Educ Today. 2021; 101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104875

Pearce L. New approach to nurse education affects every registrant – but are you ready?. Nursing Standard. 2019; 34:(9)24-26 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.34.9.24.s12

Royal College of Nursing. Helping students get the best from their practice placements: A Royal College of Nursing toolkit. 2017. https://www.richmondtraininghub.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PUB-006035.pdf (accessed 30 January 2023)

Smith J, Cambers W. Using an electronic assessment system for nursing students on placements. Br J Nurs. 2017; 26:(21)1192-1196 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.21.1192

Preparing nurse educators for NMC standards for student supervision and assessment: the impact 4 years on

09 February 2023
Volume 32 · Issue 3

Abstract

Four years on from its launch in 2018 (at the time of writing), the authors provide an up-to-date efficacy assessment of the ongoing implementation of the Nursing and Midwifery Council's Future Nurse: Standards of Proficiency for Registered Nurses(NMC) (2018a). Although these standards have comprehensively transformed the mentorship practices of nursing education courses within higher education, this article provides the first attempt to gauge and synthesise attitudes towards their implementation. Presenting the results of an evaluative survey that collates educators' current views on the implementation of these NMC standards, the authors detail and analyse the past and continuing impacts of this paradigm shift on staff, students, and practice. The findings contribute to the nascent body of knowledge, primarily clustering around four interlinked themes: slow acclimatisation to new models of assessment and supervision; variation in levels of preparation; prohibitive workloads; and role conflict. The authors conclude by providing a recommendation that more robust training resources around the NMC's standards are implemented nationally, in order to provide consistency of delivery by educators across the sector.

In the years since the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) launched the new national standards (NMC, 2018a), the implementation of these has affected the dissolution of traditional models of mentorship, in parallel with the emergence of new roles to support students in academic and practice environments. In the NMC's supplemental guidance, Part 2: Standards for Student Supervision and Assessment (SSSA) (NMC, 2018b), further changes to the way that students are supported in clinical practice are outlined, not only shifting focus from the formerly pivotal role of ‘mentor’, but also introducing three new roles: practice supervisor [PS], practice assessor [PA] and academic assessor [AA]. Whereas historically the NMC's proposed model of mentorship required ‘mentors’ to support any individual student in practice – as outlined in the previous Standards for Learning and Assessment in Practice (NMC, 2008) – mentorship has now become a significantly more collaborative endeavour.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content