References
Wound assessment and dressing selection: an overview
Abstract
Wound healing consists of four overlapping phases. Holistic assessment of a wound is essential and can confirm whether healing is progressing as anticipated. Frameworks can assist the clinician to conduct the assessment in a systematic way and to plan appropriate care for the patient. Dressings form a relatively small part of the overall care plan, but with such an array available the choice can be overwhelming. This article provides an update on wound assessment using the TIMERS framework and considers the factors influencing dressing choice.
Normal wound healing is a process consisting of four overlapping phases—inflammation, proliferation, epithelialisation, and remodelling (also known as maturation). Assessment of a wound can confirm that healing is progressing in a timely manner and identify any factors that may delay or stall the process.
‘Acute’ is the term used for a wound progressing through the phases of healing at the expected rate (Lazarus et al, 1994) whereas a ‘hard-to-heal’ wound (sometimes referred to as a ‘chronic’ wound) does not progress through the phases of healing in a timely and orderly manner. Definitions vary, but those that do not heal within 6 weeks to 3 months are often considered hard-to-heal (Kyaw et al, 2018).
Dressings are used to protect wounds from infection and assist with moist wound healing, but knowing what dressing to choose can be complex. Although appropriate dressing selection is important, dressings form just a small part of the holistic treatment package. Wound assessment guides the clinician in their dressing choice as part of a wider plan of care.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Limited access to clinical or professional articles
-
Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content